Simulator and mission-system integration

Add governed agents.
Keep your simulator in command.

Stark gives simulator OEMs, primes, and program integration teams a bounded way to add agent behavior without replacing the software, domain logic, or authority model they already own.

Built for established delivery teams

Extend the product. Preserve the workshare.

Stark is designed to fit beneath the team that already understands the simulator, mission domain, buyer, and delivery environment.

01 / PARTNER FIT

Simulator OEMs

Add governed agent behavior to a simulator roadmap while preserving the product, domain model, operator experience, and release process your team owns.

02 / PARTNER FIT

Prime contractors

Bring in a focused runtime and integration team beneath a clear workshare while keeping program leadership and the customer relationship with the prime.

03 / PARTNER FIT

Program integration teams

Connect agent proposals to an established mission system through a bounded seam that the host can inspect, constrain, test, and accept.

Retained authority

The partner keeps the system, the mission logic, and the decision.

The partner retains its simulator, domain logic, authoritative state, policy, scoring, customer relationship, and deployment acceptance.

Product and mission ownership
The partner owns the simulator, operator experience, domain logic, scenarios, roadmap, and customer relationship.
Authoritative execution
The partner system remains the source of truth for state, time, identity, permissions, policy, scoring, action admission, and consequence.
Runtime boundary
Stark manages bounded agent work and returns typed proposals for the partner system to admit, constrain, reject, or clarify.
Qualification and acceptance
Pinpoint can help design evaluations and collect technical evidence. The responsible program defines the environment, acceptance goals, and deployment decision.

Commercial path

License the runtime, add specialist support, or combine both.

Stark runtime licensing and Pinpoint integration and evaluation services are separate, complementary offers. Neither requires replacing partner software.

01

Runtime licensing

License Stark

Choose this when
For teams that want their own engineers to embed and operate the governed runtime inside software they own.
What the offer includes
Stark runtime licensing, integration guidance, and a qualification plan shaped around the selected host boundary.
What the partner keeps
Product ownership, integration decisions, model selection, domain behavior, release management, and deployment acceptance.
02

Engineering support

Integrate with Pinpoint

Choose this when
For teams that want specialist help defining agent roles, connecting the host boundary, and preparing a measurable pilot.
What the offer includes
Pinpoint integration and evaluation services for observation design, action mapping, host admission, evidence, and qualification support.
What the partner keeps
The simulator, domain logic, customer relationship, authoritative decisions, and final acceptance of the integrated capability.
03

Combined workshare

License and build together

Choose this when
For teams that want a licensed runtime plus Pinpoint support for the first bounded integration and evaluation cycle.
What the offer includes
A scoped workshare with explicit interfaces, responsibilities, evidence goals, and a handoff path for the partner engineering team.
What the partner keeps
The existing software and product direction. Stark extends the partner system rather than replacing it.

Bounded integration sequence

Connect agent intent to the simulator's own consequence path.

Each step is designed around a clear handoff that the partner can inspect, evaluate, and keep under native authority.

  1. 01

    Bound the observation

    Choose the smallest useful view of simulator state, time, and mission context for each agent role. Everything else stays outside the agent boundary.

  2. 02

    Define typed actions and tools

    Express what an agent may propose in the partner system's own domain vocabulary, with explicit values, limits, and safe no-action outcomes.

  3. 03

    Admit through native policy

    Route every proposal through the partner's existing permissions and policy so the authoritative host can accept, reject, constrain, or request clarification.

  4. 04

    Apply the consequence

    Only the host changes simulation state, advances time, updates scoring, or creates any other mission consequence.

  5. 05

    Retain reviewable evidence

    Connect bounded intent, typed proposal, host decision, observable consequence, result, and repeatable run identity for evaluation.

  6. 06

    Qualify the named deployment

    Exercise the selected models, host boundary, failure behavior, and acceptance goals in the environment the responsible program will evaluate.

Start with an unclassified interface conversation.

Bring only unclassified, non-sensitive representative interface shapes, action vocabularies, scenarios, and acceptance goals. A short description is enough for the first conversation.

Keep the public handoff clean

Do not send source code, system artifacts, credentials, controlled data, or sensitive mission details through the public site.

Choose the next conversation

See the control model, then scope the smallest useful seam.

Start with a capability demonstration or bring an unclassified representative boundary for a focused integration conversation.